Posted by Chris Eng in RESEARCH, April 15, 2008 |
I was just reading an article discussing the timeframe for upcoming revisions to the PCI-DSS. Nothing quite so exciting as reading about a compliance roadmap, right? This article reminded us about PCI Section 6.6 becoming mandatory in June 2008, with additional guidance and clarification coming in May (hey, a whole month to prepare!). As a refresher, 6.6 says that web applications must be reviewed by a third party for security vulnerabilities, or a web application firewall (WAF) must be installed. Anyway, in this article, PCI-DSS General Manager Bob Russo makes the following statement:
“Personally, I’d love …
Posted by Chris Eng in RESEARCH, September 20, 2007 |
Earlier this week, I attended the first PCI Community Meeting in Toronto, a gathering organized by the PCI Security Standards Council to bring QSAs, ASVs, and other PCI stakeholders together in one room with the PCI Council. Let’s be honest here — in the security industry, discussing regulatory compliance is about as dull as it gets. On the other hand, compliance is also a major catalyst, sometimes the only catalyst, in convincing organizations to improve their security posture, so it’s important to understand. As might be expected, I focused my attention on the sessions dealing with …
Posted by John Jacott in RESEARCH, May 24, 2007 |
Identity theft and the huge TJX breach have brought information technology and security to the forefront and now the states of Texas and Massachusetts are contemplating bills that would hold corporations financially responsible for security breaches.
Computerworld’s Article states that “Texas mulls bill that would make PCI requirements a state law”. According to the article, Texas Bill HB 3222 passed the House of Representatives 139-0. It should prove interesting to see what the Texas Senate and Governor Rick Perry have to say about this. Is this really the right move …
Posted by Chris Wysopal in RESEARCH, February 23, 2007 |
TJX issued a press release yesterday coming clean on what they know about the breach of their corporate network. They are now admitting that they have been compromised as early as July 2005 and continued to be compromised up until December 2006. It is unlikely only one attacker found the vulnerabilities exploited. I wouldn’t be surprized if dozens of attackers found their way into the network during that time.
One of the pieces of data stolen was driver license numbers given by customers when returning merchandise to “T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, and HomeGoods stores in the U.S. and …