<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Boring Flaws Become Interesting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veracode.com/blog/2009/01/how-boring-flaws-become-interesting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2009/01/how-boring-flaws-become-interesting/</link>
	<description>Application security testing, analysis, and metrics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Eng</title>
		<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2009/01/how-boring-flaws-become-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-5791</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Eng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=623#comment-5791</guid>
		<description>@Eric: No idea what happened in 1.5. Download the source and report back!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric: No idea what happened in 1.5. Download the source and report back!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2009/01/how-boring-flaws-become-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-5790</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=623#comment-5790</guid>
		<description>Was this bug ever fixed in the 1.5 series? The above links don&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this bug ever fixed in the 1.5 series? The above links don&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Eng</title>
		<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2009/01/how-boring-flaws-become-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Eng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=623#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>@Kamper:

Ha! I didn&#039;t even realize the source was packaged with the JDK -- figured it would have been a separate download.  I guess I&#039;m just so used to going the decompilation route that I didn&#039;t think to look for source.  Things like the StringBuilder expression are so familiar looking at this point that I don&#039;t even notice them.  That being said, next time I&#039;ll probably remember that the source is available.  :&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kamper:</p>
<p>Ha! I didn&#8217;t even realize the source was packaged with the JDK &#8212; figured it would have been a separate download.  I guess I&#8217;m just so used to going the decompilation route that I didn&#8217;t think to look for source.  Things like the StringBuilder expression are so familiar looking at this point that I don&#8217;t even notice them.  That being said, next time I&#8217;ll probably remember that the source is available.  :></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamper</title>
		<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2009/01/how-boring-flaws-become-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=623#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>Any particular reason you decompiled the binary rather than just looking at the source that&#039;s included with jdk?  That way you get comments (although in this particular case, there aren&#039;t any), meaningful variable names and more readable things like string concatenation.  That StringBuilder expression is actually just &quot;prefix + Long.toString(n) + suffix&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any particular reason you decompiled the binary rather than just looking at the source that&#8217;s included with jdk?  That way you get comments (although in this particular case, there aren&#8217;t any), meaningful variable names and more readable things like string concatenation.  That StringBuilder expression is actually just &#8220;prefix + Long.toString(n) + suffix&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

