<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Security Issue with C++ Object Layouts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/07/a-security-issue-with-c-object-layouts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/07/a-security-issue-with-c-object-layouts/</link>
	<description>Application security testing, analysis, and metrics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/07/a-security-issue-with-c-object-layouts/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>John McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=53#comment-528</guid>
		<description>Interesting.. That&#039;s a pretty subtle bug. :&gt;

It seems somewhat related to an attack against the &quot;One Definition Rule&quot; that I stumbled on recently. I think they were thinking more along the lines of intentional trojaning via interpositioning, which IMHO isn&#039;t nearly as interesting as the bugs you&#039;ve observed in real-world code. Here are some links:

https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/MSC31-C.+Obey+the+One+Definition+Rule

http://vuduc.org/pubs/quinlan2006-odr.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Definition_Rule</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.. That&#8217;s a pretty subtle bug. :&gt;</p>
<p>It seems somewhat related to an attack against the &#8220;One Definition Rule&#8221; that I stumbled on recently. I think they were thinking more along the lines of intentional trojaning via interpositioning, which IMHO isn&#8217;t nearly as interesting as the bugs you&#8217;ve observed in real-world code. Here are some links:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/MSC31-C.+Obey+the+One+Definition+Rule" rel="nofollow">https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/MSC31-C.+Obey+the+One+Definition+Rule</a></p>
<p><a href="http://vuduc.org/pubs/quinlan2006-odr.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://vuduc.org/pubs/quinlan2006-odr.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Definition_Rule" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Definition_Rule</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christien Rioux</title>
		<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/07/a-security-issue-with-c-object-layouts/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Christien Rioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=53#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Sure, it&#039;s also a C issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it&#8217;s also a C issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas H. Ptacek</title>
		<link>http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/07/a-security-issue-with-c-object-layouts/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas H. Ptacek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=53#comment-526</guid>
		<description>Is this really a C++ issue? It seems like you could screw up a #define anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this really a C++ issue? It seems like you could screw up a #define anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

