Comments on: Vulnerability Disclosure Evolves http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/03/vulnerability-disclosure-evolves/ Application security testing, analysis, and metrics Tue, 15 May 2012 22:16:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: » Should Microsoft start paying for vulnerabilities? | Zero Day | ZDNet.com http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/03/vulnerability-disclosure-evolves/comment-page-1/#comment-488 » Should Microsoft start paying for vulnerabilities? | Zero Day | ZDNet.com Tue, 22 May 2007 22:33:44 +0000 http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=30#comment-488 [...] Eng, director of security services at Veracode, urges caution, especially when it comes to auditing Web applications: These posters either don’t realize or [...] [...] Eng, director of security services at Veracode, urges caution, especially when it comes to auditing Web applications: These posters either don’t realize or [...]

]]> By: Should Microsoft start paying for vulnerabilities? « Latest updates of hacking http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/03/vulnerability-disclosure-evolves/comment-page-1/#comment-169 Should Microsoft start paying for vulnerabilities? « Latest updates of hacking Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:55:52 +0000 http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=30#comment-169 [...] Eng, director of security services at Veracode, urges caution, especially when it comes to auditing Web [...] [...] Eng, director of security services at Veracode, urges caution, especially when it comes to auditing Web [...]

]]> By: Chris Eng http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/03/vulnerability-disclosure-evolves/comment-page-1/#comment-166 Chris Eng Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:53:06 +0000 http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=30#comment-166 Oops, forgot to add the relevant links to the thread at sla.ckers.org. Updated. Oops, forgot to add the relevant links to the thread at sla.ckers.org. Updated.

]]> By: Adam http://www.veracode.com/blog/2007/03/vulnerability-disclosure-evolves/comment-page-1/#comment-165 Adam Wed, 14 Mar 2007 05:17:47 +0000 http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=30#comment-165 What's "this site" that you refer to? Was that supposed to be a link? How about "and this?" Adam What’s “this site” that you refer to? Was that supposed to be a link? How about “and this?”

Adam

]]>